Introduction to Contemporary Society

Question: Writeabout the Introduction to Contemporary Society. Answer: Introduction The topic of the given assignment focuses on the social inequality and its effects on the larger part of the society. Many social evils have persisted in the society for ages. The impact of these evils has been deep rooted in most of the cases. It is very hard to find a country where the social inequality has not affected the moral views. It ranges from gender inequality, racial inequality and others (Cullingworth, 2012). The racial inequality has many negative impacts. In this assignment, the central focus of the assignment highlights on the negative effects of same sex marriage. Same Sex marriage Same sex marriage has been a matter of controversy for many years in the modern era (Corvino Gallagher, 2012).The idea of same sex marriage began to become a common trait from the later part of the 20th century. The main point regarding this phenomenon is the marriage or conjugal relationship between a same sex couple i.e. between two female or between two male persons. Apparently it may seem an uncommon thing to a larger portion of the society, but the sexual orientation of a person is beyond anybodys control. A male person may certainly have sexual affinity towards other males and the same is applicable for female as well. The communities that are fighting to establish the rights for these kinds of people are very active in different countries. They are called the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) people (Peterson Panfil, 2014). The laws in different countries have always raised questions in favor of the people who deserve the rights to be treated as a member of the same society along with other normal members. The inequality among people regarding gender issues should not at all be tolerated at any cost. The people who belong to this category sometimes keep aloof from society in fear of disclosing of their sexual orientation. Gradually they become secluded from their families and later from the society. These consequences surely affect their mental health (Wight, LeBlanc Lee, 2013). Marriage is a civil right of human beings and the sexual orientation is completely dependent upon the particular person. The attempt to stop the same sex couples from being married is completely an act of social discrimination and an act of violating civil rights. Some people give the logic that same sex marriages cannot yield productivity or give birth to babies. This point can be countered by saying that there some heterosexual couples who does not intend to have babies after their marriage. They should be prevented from getting married if giving childbirth is only the objective of marriage. People who go against the idea of same sex marriage argue that this idea harms the traditional view of marriage between a man and a woman. Same sex marriage is compatible with homosexuality, which is considered as immoral and unnatural behavior (Dynes, 2016). Some people are also of the opinion that if same sex marriage is legalized, the children would be targeted. The same-sex couples do not g et the rights of institutionalizing their marriage due to social unacceptability. This is surely an injustice to them. Social Science Concepts Regarding the Issue There have been several debates regarding the issue of homosexuality and same sex marriage throughout these years. The major social concept regarding this issue was the social stigma in the 1970s. Therefore the social stigma regarding same sex marriage also gave birth to the social concept that stated that children of gay partners will not be normal. In defining normal, scholars also indicated that the opposition of the marriage union had said that this marriage union may be in the best interest of the homosexuals but it can never be in the best interest of the children (Boswell, 2015). This concept states that while growing up children need both the mother and father, however, in the same sex marriage it is not possible. The oppositions also affirm that if the same sex civil marriages are common, most of the children will be growing up either two mother or two fathers, therefore their development in the early stages would be hampered. They focus on the fact that fathers have a uniqu e biological and social influence on the children, and at the same time it cannot be denied that children need mothers as well. Therefore this social concept addresses the fact that same sex couples will have inadequate parenting capability. However, this concept can be entirely nullified with the results of a recent study. This study indicates that there are no such differences between the children who are raised by the homosexual couples and other who are raised by the heterosexual ones. It involved randomly selected large samples of the young adults who have been raised by parents from a same sex relationship. They are loved as much as the other children with heterosexual parents are loved. Other scientific researchers also have compared the children of same sex marriages with different other kinds of family and concluded that while children are being raised by their fathers primarily they are absolutely competent in their developmental process and do not raise any kind of clinic al concern (Connell, 2014). These studies indicate that having a mother and a father can be considered as the ideal environment to raise children, but most of the times, that is not common. Therefore, it can be said there is not such sustainable development regarding the difficulty concerns on the personal development among the children of same sex marriage in the studies conducted. Another social science concept that has further stigmatized the same sex marriage is that same sex marriages may isolate the marriage from the basic purpose of it. The traditional purpose of the marriage is to be connected with each other and provide a secured environment for the child. However, even though traditionally the primary reason for marriage was to have children, most of the westerners nowadays see marriage as an emotional union. It is believed that when two people, most importantly any two people are in love and want to lead their life together for the rest of their lives they should be allowed to get married (Bernstein Taylor, 2013). However, the oppositions of the same sex marriage indicate that it may decrease the future population highly. This concept though is seen as an anti nationalist one that put a political, social and economic pressure on the larger society. However, in recent times, the union of marriage is not seen in the traditional way (Conkle, 2014). No m atter it is a homosexual or a heterosexual marriage, the modern concept of marriage now undercuts the long connected norm with the marriage and further establishes that there is no such necessary linkage between the marriage and procreation. Therefore, this social concept regarding the nullification of same sex marriage has also been dismissed. Conclusion In the concluding part of the presentation, it can be stated that the curse of social inequality has shed a deep impact on the social structure and in the minds of people.. The problems of same sex marriage can also bring lack of faith and intolerance among some people of the society. These practices shed adverse effects on the society. It also increases social discrimination that is the source of many troubles. This practice should be stopped at immediate effect. Reference List and Bibliography Bernstein, M., Taylor, V. (2013).The Marrying Kind?: Debating Same-Sex Marriage within the Lesbian and Gay Movement. University of Minnesota Press. Boswell, J. (2015).Christianity, social tolerance, and homosexuality: Gay people in Western Europe from the beginning of the Christian era to the fourteenth century. University of Chicago Press. Conkle, D. O. (2014). Evolving Values, Animus, and Same-Sex Marriage.Ind. LJ,89, 27. Connell, R. W. (2014).Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. John Wiley Sons. Corvino, J., Gallagher, M. (2012).Debating same-sex marriage. OUP USA. Cullingworth, J. B. (2012).Problems of an Urban Society: The social framework of planning. Routledge. Dynes, W. R. (Ed.). (2016).Encyclopedia of homosexuality(Vol. 2). Routledge. Wight, R. G., LeBlanc, A. J., Lee Badgett, M. V. (2013). Same-sex legal marriage and psychological well-being: findings from the California Health Interview Survey.American journal of public health,103(2), 339-346.